SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 131

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE
Ali Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Kazi Golam Bari – Respondent


Advocates:
Bhabesh Chandra Mitter, for Petitioner; Barun Kumar Roy Chaudhury, for Opposite Party.

ORDER :- This Rule was issued at the instance of one Syed Ali Mondal under the following circumstances:

2. Syed Ali Mondal was the purchaser of some properties sold at a Court sale held in Rent Execution Case No.649 of 1952 in the Court of the 2nd Munsif, Baraset. Thereafter the judgment debtors filed an application on 17-3-1953 for setting aside the sale under S.174(3), Bengal Tenancy Act. An objection was filed to that petition by auction-purchaser Syed Ali Mondal on 2-5-1953. Notices were thereafter issued to the persons who were made opposite parties in the sale set aside case.

But it appears that the notice was duly served on opposite party No.5 who was subsequently made a party in that case. The result was that on 3-10-1953, the Court recorded an order, in the order-sheet directing the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of a registered post card upon the above opposite parties by 14-11-1953. On that date the petitioners filed hajira but did not take any steps for service of fresh notice by registered post as they had been directed to do by the order of the previous date and so the case was dismissed for non-prosecution.

On 19-11-1953 the petitioners filed an application

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top