SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 129

P.C.MALLICK
Deluxe Film Distributors – Appellant
Versus
Sukumar Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Somnath Chatterjee, for Petitioner; Siddhartha Roy, for Respondent.

ORDER :- This is an application for stay under S. 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act. The application is resisted on two grounds - (i) the applicant has taken steps in the proceedings and (ii) that the contract containing the arbitration clause has been modified by subsequent agreements to such extent that the arbitration clauses have become ineffective and that the arbitration agreement does not cover the disputes raised in the suit.

2. The suit is for the recovery of the sum of Rs. 2, 43, 804/13/4. The claim is under a contract for the distribution of a cinematograph film. The plaintiff is the Producer and the defendant No. 1 is the Distributor. The film proved to be very successful and had a long run in a large number of cinema houses. It is said that the box office receipt was very heavy. After giving credit for Rs. 10,000/- paid by the defendant No. 1 to the plaintiff there was due and owing to the plaintiff a large sum as claimed in the plaint. The defendant by his solicitors letter dated November 24, 1958 contended that the amount due to the plaintiff would not be as much as claimed but would be only Rs. 1, 01, 048.18. The disputes between the parties not having been settled th



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top