DIPANKAR DATTA
Dinesh Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
Dipankar Datta, J.
1. For enforcing its security interest, the respondent bank approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barasat, North 24-Parganas (hereafter the said Magistrate) with an application under section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of the Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The application was registered as M.P. Case No. 169/2011. An order was passed on 16th September, 2011 by the said Magistrate directing the Officer-in-Charge, Baguihati Police Station "to take actual possession of the immovable property/secured assets mentioned in the schedule of the petition along with Title Deeds and other documents i.c.w. the said assets from the O.P. and deliver the same to the authorized representative of the applicant/Bank....." It was further observed in the order that should there be resistance from any quarter, the officer-in-charge shall be at liberty to use so much force that is necessary for the purpose of taking possession of the secured asset. For the purpose of submission of report, the application was made returnable on 9th December, 2012. On the returnable date i.e. 9th December, 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.