SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 923

KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
PARMANAND AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
PARMESHWAR DAS AGARWAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. J. Sengupta, ACJ.: These appeals are directed against a common order dated 3rd August, 2010 whereby the learned Single Judge was pleased to dispose of three interlocutory applications, namely G.A. No. 1009 of 2008, G.A. No. 2123 of 2009 and G.A. 407 of 2010.

Pursuant to an earlier order both the appeals were directed to be heard analogously. Hence they are disposed of by this common judgement and order.

2. APO No. 365 of 2010 has been taken out by the plaintiffs in the suit against the order of rejection of their prayer for interim relief in G.A. No. 1009 of 2008. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in the said appeal (being defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the suit) have filed a cross-objection therein challenging the order dated 03.08.2010 to the extent it directs them to deposit a sum of Rs. 4 crore with Registrar, Original Side to the credit of the suit and also directs continuation of the interim order till such deposit is made.

3. APO No. 366 of 2010 is also taken out by the said defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the suit challenging the aforesaid order of the learned Single Judge to the extent its permits amendment of the plaint as prayed for by the plaintiffs in the said suit in G.A. No.















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top