ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, SHUKLA KABIR SINHA
ITP LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.:
PREFACE
1. Both these appeals would relate to a short but important question as to whether a scheme of amalgamation and/or arrangement sanctioned by the High Court under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1956) would attract the mischief of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 in the State of West Bengal and, if so, to what extent.
2. The appellants contended before the learned Judge, the order of sanction of the scheme of amalgamation or arrangement was nothing but an arrangement and/or re-alignment of business and/or trade activity of the company as per the wish of the body of shareholders that would not amount to transfer of any immovable or movable property either under the Transfer of Property Act or otherwise attracting Stamp Duty as per the said Act of 1899. The learned Judge held it otherwise. His Lordship held, it was a voluntary transfer hence, would attract appropriate Stamp Duty. Hence, this appeal by the appellants.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3. In the case of Emami Biotech Ltd., it was a transfer of a business by the transferor company in favour of the transferee company, both run by the common management having co
General Radio & Appliances Company Limited vs. M.A. Khader
Hameed Zoharan (Dead) vs. Abdul Salam
Hindustan Lever vs. State of Maharashtra
Miheer H. Mafatlal vs Mafatlal Industrial Ltd.
Rubi Sales and Services Private Limited vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Orissa vs. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra
Automac(Madras) Private Limited
Hero Motors Limited vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Limited vs. CIT Haryana, Himachal Pradesh-III, New Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.