SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Cal) 414

BASWANATH SOMADDER
Tarapada Dey – Appellant
Versus
Amitava Dey – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Udayan Pramanik Mr. Kaushik Sarkar
Mr. G.S. Pal, Mr. Subhasis Pal

JUDGMENT

Re. CAN 3116 of 2009.

1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the applicants be kept on record.

2. Heard the learned advocates for the parties.

3. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing a review application. After considering the submissions made by the learned advocates, I am of the view that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay and as such the delay in filing the review application, being RVW 54 of 2009 is condoned and the application stands allowed accordingly.

RVW 54 of 2009.

4. This is an application for review of the judgment and order dated 19 January, 2009, passed by this Court in an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, being C.O.3641 of 2007.

5. The applicants herein were the petitioners in the aforesaid revisional application. In the said revisional application, an order passed by the learned executing court dismissing the judgment-debtors’ application filed before it under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was sought to be challenged.

6. By the judgment and order dated 19th January, 2009, this Court, upon perusing the pleadings and after taking into consideration the respective contentio






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top