Amal Kanti Bhattacharji
Sri Becharam Das – Appellant
Versus
Sri Purna Chandra Das – Respondent
This appeal is directed against an appellate decree passed by the District Judge of Howrah reversing the judgment of the trial court. The sole question raised in the Courts below was if a person claiming to be a co-sharer in some immovable property is evitable as a licensee when he fails to prove his alleged share in the said property. The facts of the case out of which the appeal arose in the lower appellate court may be briefly stated as follows:
2. The plaintiff-appellant Becharam Das filed a suit in the trial court for eviction of the defendants-respondents from the suit property i.e. two rooms of premises Do. 13/14 Joy Narayan Babu Anauda Dutta Lane alleging that they were illegally possessing those rooms after entering the same on the basis of permission given in a previous suit. Previously a partition suit was filed by the plaintiff's uncle one Jogendra' Nath Das claiming one fifth share in the aforesaid premises. The basis of his claim was that the premises in question each belonged to his father Brajonath Das who died leaving five sons inheriting one fifth share. The plaintiff's mother and his other uncles were defendants in the said partition suit. The said suit wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.