Having heard the learned Attorney General of India with Dr. Tapas Banerjee for Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd. in support of the application for vacating and/or varying the order dated 30th December, 1992 and the subsequent order dated 7th January, 1993 and Mr. Suhas Banerjee, learned advocate for the writ petitioner it appears that the writ petition was entertained and considering the urgency compliance with Rule 27 of the Original Side Rules was dispensed with. An interim order was made restraining the respondents from passing any final order till 11.1.93. The matter was to appear before the Appropriate Bench on 5.1.93. Liberty was granted to pray for extension of the interim order. By order dated 7.1.93, leave was granted to the respondents to make a formal application for vacating the interim order. It was made clear that the interim order granted by the learned Vacation Judge would continue till the disposal of the application for vacating the interim order.

2. The writ petitioner Rabindra Nath Sinha filed the writ petition challenging the notice dated l4.12.92, issued by the Director (Personnel), Andrew Rule & Co. to the petitioner in order to take suitable decision on the enquiry