Altamas Kabir
Surajbali Pandey & Company – Appellant
Versus
CESC Ltd. – Respondent
Altamas Kabir, J.:
1. The petitioner concern claims to be a tenant under the respondent No.5 in respect of one room at premises No. 1/1A, Vansitart Row, Calcutta-700001. According to the petitioner concern, it had an electric meter for D.C. connection in its name in the said room, which it had surrendered in order to obtain an A.C. connection, in keeping with the prevailing rules of the Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Ltd (hereinafter referred to as 'CESC Ltd.'). It appears that the petitioner concern, thereafter, applied to the CESC Ltd. for A.C. connection in place of the D.C. meter, which had been surrendered, upon payment by the petitioner concern of all the necessary charges and upon compliance with all other requirements. Since the CESC Ltd. was dragging its feet in the matter, the petitioner concern appears to have approached the Calcutta District Forum and on and August, 1991, an order was passed by the Forum directing the CESC Ltd. to instal a new A.C. meter within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order. Pursuant to the said order, the CESC Ltd. was about to instal the new connection when it was served with an order passed by the learned Judge, 7th Cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.