Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee, Ram Prakash Gupta
Hari Charan Garodia – Appellant
Versus
Nikunj Kumar Lohia – Respondent
Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee, J.: The appeal has been treated as on day’s list and taken up for hearing by consent of the particle after dispending with all the formalities and discharging the undertaking given by the appellant.
2. This, is an appeal against the order passed by the learned Trial Judge on 4th May, 1995 allowing the application for summary revocation of the caveat filed by the appellant Hari Charan Garodia in respect of the last Will and Testament of Hari Prasad Lohia since deceased in respect of which an application for probate was filed by his brother's son Nikunja Lohia.
3. The caveat was not filed by any of the heirs and/or the legal representative of the deceased Hari Prasad Lohia but by the appellant claiming to have interest in, the property of the deceased. The appellant claims that his interest in the property of the deceased is on the ground, that the appellant had filed a suit for a claim against the property of the deceased and obtained an order of attachment before judgment in the said suit by an order passed by Justice Hazari, J, (as His Lordship then was) on 27th August, 1993 in a suit filed by the appellant against Smt. Durga Debi Goenka & Ors. Ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.