Ruma Pal
Santosh Kumar Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Ruma Pal, J.: None appeared on behalf of the added respondent, viz. North Bengal State Transport Corporation (NBSTC) after service. No affidavit-in-opposition has also been filed by the State-respondents although it appears that a copy of the affidavit-in-opposition was served by the respondents on the petitioner. I am, therefore, disposing of the application on the basis of the materials before me including the copy of the State respondents' affidavit handed over to Court by the petitioner.
2. The facts of the case relate to premises No. 73 and 73/1/2A, Bagmari Road, Calcutta (referred to as 'the' premises'). The petitioner No. 1 had purchased the premises in 1971. The premises were sought to be requisitioned under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 1948 Act'). The purpose of such requisition was stated for the purpose of maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community and for increasing employment opportunities along with other facilities by construction of a civic centre in C.I.T. Scheme No. VIII. The area covered was 5 Cottas 4 sq.ft. being prevalent to 0.962 acres or 0.0389 hectre. The posses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.