SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 164

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Satyabrata Sinha, J.
Ganga Dhar Singh & Ors.
vs.
The State of West Bengal and Ors.
WRIT W.P. NO. 1334(W) of 1997
Decided On : April 9, 1997

Advocate Appeared:
B. Chowdhury, Goutam Kumar Thakur, Debasis Guin Advocates for the petitioners;
Mrs. Manjuri Gupta, A.C. Maitra, A.N. Banerjee, Syed Nazmul Hossain Advocates for the respondents.

The State Government has the power to extend the provisions of a law to the transferred territories by issuing a notification, and such extension does not require a further notification under a different provision of the law.

Headnote:

BIHAR AND WEST BENGAL (TRANSFER OF TERRITORIES) ACT, 1958 - WEST BENGAL TRANSFERRED TERRITORIES (ASSIMILATION OF LAWS) ACT, 1958 - WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS ACT, 1955 - WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1972 - Interpretation of provisions related to the transfer of territories and assimilation of laws.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, residents of areas transferred from Bihar to West Bengal under the Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) Act, 1958, challenged notices issued to them under Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, as inserted by the West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1972, arguing that a valid notification extending Chapter IIB to the transferred territories was not issued.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, was made applicable to the transferred territories by a notification dated 24th June, 1967, and subsequent notifications extended certain provisions of the Act to the transferred territories. The court found that Chapter IIB of the Act, inserted by the 1972 Amendment Act, was also applicable to the transferred territories, as it was brought into force in the entire State of West Bengal by a notification dated 13th February, 1971.

Issues: 1. Whether a notification was required to extend Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, to the transferred territories. 2. Whether the second proviso appended to s. 3(3) of the West Bengal Transferred Territories (Assimilation of Laws) Act, 1958, is void.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the provisions of the Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) Act, 1958, and the West Bengal Transferred Territories (Assimilation of Laws) Act, 1958, and held that the State Government had the power to extend the provisions of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, to the transferred territories by issuing a notification. 2. The court held that the second proviso appended to s. 3(3) of the Assimilation of Laws Act was not void, as it merely conferred a power on the State Government to remove doubts or difficulties in the application of the Act.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' applications, holding that Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, was applicable to the transferred territories and that the impugned notices issued under the Act were valid.

JUDGMENT

Satyabrata Sinha, J.

These applications involve a question as regard construction of the provisions of Bihar and West Bengal (Transfer of Territories) Act, 1958, (hereinafter referred to as Transfer of Territories Act) and the West Bengal Transferred Territories (Assimilation of Laws) Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Assimilation of Law Act).

2. The petitioners are residents of such places which were prior to coming into force of the Transfer of Territories Act were situate in the State of Bihar. By reason of the provisions of the said Act, the areas mentioned therein stood transferred to the State of West Bengal with effect from 1st November, 1956 and for that purpose the First Schedule of the Constitution was also amended. Section 3 of the Transfer of Territories Act provides for transfer of the territories from the State of Bihar to the State of West Bengal. Other relevant provisions to which reference shall be made hereinafter are to Part VIII thereof.

3. The Assimilation of Laws Act were enacted for the assimilation of certain laws in force to the territories transferred from the State of Bihar to the State of West Bengal by reason of s. 3 of the Transfer of the Territories Act.

4. In these cases notices had been issued upon the petitioners in terms of the relevant provisions of the Chapter IIB as inserted by West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1971 which are the subject matter of challenge in these writ applications.

5. Mr. Ghosh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has principally raised two contentions in support of these applications. It is submitted that although a notification dated 24th June, 1967 was issued in terms of the Assimilation of Laws Act appointing 30th June, 1967 as the date with effect from which the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 specified in Item No. 4 of Schedule-III shall extend to the Transfer of Territories and a further notification was issued under the Land Reforms Act in that regard extending the provisions of Chapter II, IIA, IV, VI(3) of s. 17, Ss. 39, 40, 41, 42, 53, 54, 55 and 56 and cls. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of s. 59 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act with effect from 1st day of October, 1969 by a notification dated 26th September, 1969; but as no notification has been issued specifying a date from which Chapter IIB of the said Act shall come into force, the impugned proceeding are bad in law.

6. In support of the aforementioned contention reliance has been placed on M/s. Jalan Trading Co. Private Ltd. v. Mill Mazdoor Sabha reported in AIR 1967 SC 691 and Rajnarain Singh v. Chairman, Patna Administration Committee, Patna & Anr. reported in AIR 1954 SC 569. It was also contended that the 1967 notification is not all pervasive. The learned counsel has also drawn the attention of this court to Sri Sri Madan Mohan Jiu Thakur & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors. reported in CLT 1989(2) HC 174 wherein it has categorically been held that unless a notification is issued bringing into force Chapter VIII of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, the said provisions would not apply to the territories which were transferred to the State of West Bengal in terms of Transfer of Territories Act.

7. It was further submitted that in terms of s. 43 of Transfer of Territories Act, the competent authority does not mean the State Government and the said provision requires a legislative Act in absence whereof the provisions of the said Act cannot be said to be applicable. In any event the second proviso appended to s. 3(3) of Assimilation of Laws Act is void as the same is subject to s. 4 thereof, in terms whereof the State has been conferred with the power of remove doubts under the provisions of the said Act, if any.

8. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, does not dispute the fact that no notification has been issued upon coming into force of Chapter IIB of the Act. However, it is submitted that the notification dated 24th June, 1967
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top