SATYABRATA SINHA, B.Bhattacharya
Hiralal Sha – Appellant
Versus
Debprosad Dey – Respondent
B. BHATTACHARYYA, J.
1. This First Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by a third party/resister against the order passed by the learned Judge, 2nd Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta thereby allowing the application of the respondent no.1 under Order 21 Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure and granting police help for execution of the decree for recovery of possession passed in favour of the respondent no.1. The undisputed position is that the respondent no.1 filed a suit for eviction against the respondent nos. 2 to 8 obtained a decree which was affirmed up to this Court. Subsequently, the respondent no.1 decree holder put the said decree into execution and obtained recovery of possession in execution of the same. But on the same day the judgment-debtors again trespassed into the suit property which prompted the respondent no.1 to file an application for restoration of the said execution case and the learned judge was pleased to allow the same. Against the order, respondent nos. 2 to 8 filed a revisional application before this court but this court did not interfere with the order of the learned executing court restoring the execution case.
2. Thereafter in execution of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.