SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 559

S.B.Sinha, H.Banerji
Archana Bag – Appellant
Versus
Madan Mohan Bag – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Smritikana Mukherjee for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.

This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 9th February, 1984 passed by Sri M. R. Mullick, District Judge, Howrah whereby and whereunder the said learned Judge allowed the suit for divorce filed by the respondent herein.

2. Having regard to the nature of the controversy it is not necessary to state the fact in great detail. Suffice it to point out that the parties were married according to Hindu Rites and had started living together at village Pantihal. The respondent herein brought out the aforementioned suit for divorce, inter. alia, on the ground that the appellant herein was leading an adulterous life with one Dilip Das and again with one Manick Khara. By an amendment the ground of cruelty had also been taken. The appellant herein in her written statement as also additional written statement denied and disputed the aforementioned allegations. The learned Judge having regard to the pleadings of the parties framed the following issues :-

1. Is the suit maintainable in its present form?

2. Is the respondent guilty of adultery?

3. Is the petitioner entitled to get a decree of divorce as parayed for?

4. To what other relief or reliefs, if any, is th













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top