SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 285

S.B.SINHA, H.BANERJI
Panchu Gopal Das – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S. Pal, Biswapriya Roy for the Petitioner.
Chandra Sekhar Das, Atashi Gupta for the Respondents.

ORDER

1. This writ application is directed against order dated 8.3.2000 whereby and whereunder the application preferred before the learned Tribunal has been dismissed directing.

"The learned Government representative has put up the record.

There is an adage in English that he who seeks equity must do equity or otherwise whoever comes in any forum, must come with clean hands.

It appears on perusal of the records alongwith the Annexure which include amongst others, the records put up by the learned Government representative that the petitioner has not come up with clean hands. He has completely belied the truth the object being to harvest relief at a cheaper cost.

The petitioner has elaborately researched in his petition that he is personally cultivating the land which itself is a downright falsehood and this has not been accepted by the learned Revenue Officer Panskura-I, P.O. Panskura, District Midnapore. To galvanize his claim for personal cultivation. Thus, when we look to several Annexure, which include amongst others' the record of O.B. Case No. 125 of 1995, it is a rum our afloat in the air. The extract of the few lines from the judgment of the aforesaid case being no. 125 of 1999





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top