SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 104

Dilip Kumar Seth
Russel Properties & Estates – Appellant
Versus
Indian Alluminium Company Ltd. – Respondent


Order

D.K. Seth, J.

In this application amongst others the following prayer has been made:

(Para 15)

"(a) The pliant filed in the above suit be rejected and/or be returned to the plaintiff and/or an enquiry be ordered under section 11 of the West Bengal Court Fees Act, 1970."

2. In order to support such relief Mr. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the suit is barred for misjoinder of cause of action. The cause of action pleaded cannot be joined together under Order 2 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Next he contends that there are misjoinder of parties and that the suit can not proceed. Third point that was taken by him is that the suit has been valued at Rs. 15 lakhs only to create jurisdiction of this court without any foundation. Elaborating his submission be contended that the present one is a suit for eviction in which the claim for damage cannot be incorporated since it is altogether a different cause of action which cannot be joined in a suit for eviction. Similarly, he contends that the claim for damages is a money claim which is confined against the defendant No.1 alone and as such defendants No.2 and 3 cannot be roped in and therefore it is altogethe
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top