SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 633

Subhro Kamal Mukherjee
Bibekananda Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M. J. Abedin, M. A. Alim for the petitioner;
Prafulla Kumar Ghosh for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.

The writ petitioner is a Home Guard. He was attached to Mandir Bazar Police Station. The Officer-in-Charge of the said police station directed the petitioner to accompany him to Bhawanipur Police Hospital for the treatment of the said Officer-in-Charge. Surprisingly, the Superintendent of Police, on November 2, 1978, dismissed the Home Guard concerned for complying with the direction of his superior. The Home Guard concerned challenged the order of termination before this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which was registered as Civil Rule No. 6328(W) of 1979.

2. On November 2, 1987 Sudhir Ranjan Ray, J. allowed the writ application and, consequently, the said rule was made absolute. The order or discharge was set aside and the respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner in service, within a period of 30(thirty) days from the date of communication of the said order, with all back wages from the October 30, 1978 as might be admissible to him under the relevant rules and in accordance with law. It was, further, directed that the back wages have to be paid to the petitioner within 60Csixty) days from the date of his reins













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top