SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 96

Bhaskar Bhattacharya
Sukanta Mitra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sridhar Chandra Bagari for the petitioner;
M. Goswami for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.

By this writ application a dismissed employee of the Border Security Force has challenged the order of dismissal which has since been affirmed by the Appellate Authority as well as by the Director General, Border Security Force, a reviewing authority.

2. There is no dispute that all the respondents are staying outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and at the same time, the order of dismissal was passed against the petitioner when he was posted in Rajasthan.

3. In view of such fact, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has taken a preliminary objection as regards the maintainability of this writ application on the ground that this Court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this writ application.

4. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on the other hand, has submitted that although all the respondents are staying outside the territorial limit of this Court, the cause of action of the instant writ application has partly arisen within the jurisdiction of this court where the petitioner is actually staying. According to the petitioner, the order of the respondent/authority having been served u




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top