MAHITOSH MAJUMDAR
Santi Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
1. This writ application is directed against the chargesheet as contained in Annexure ‘C’ to the writ application, together with the statement or articles of charges. The petitioner replied to the charge-sheet. Thereafter, the petitioner asked for certain documents by which articles of charges were proposed to be sustained against the petitioner. The proceeding thereafter commenced, continued and concluded. Before holding of the enquiry, certain orders which were not shown to the petitioner were passed by the concerned Minister, the Disciplinary Authority recorded certain finding. There is also an endorsement that another allegation has been enquired into by the Vigilance Commission against the petitioner Smt. Santi Chakravarti, although the said allegation does not find place in the charge sheet or it has been made known to the petitioner Many references made in the proceeding file, the xerox copies of which are annexed to the supplementary affidavit are nor produced before this Court. Sri M.R. Konar recorded the statement on 3.9.77 which is quoted below :-
“In compliance with orders of Minister-in Charge, Animal Husbandry & Very Services Deptt. conveyed under No. 386/N/AH&VS/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.