SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 104

R.N.PYNE, JYOTIRMOYEE NAG
Tusnial Trading Company – Appellant
Versus
Himangshu Kumar Roy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S. Tibriwal for the appellant ;
Heerak Mitra for the respondents.

Judgment :

R.N. Pyne. J:

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated September 13, 1982 of C.K. Banerji, J. allowing the application made by the respondent No. 1, Himangshu Kumar Roy for dismissal of Suit No. 818 of 1978 (Tusnial Trading Company v. Himanshu Kumar Roy & others) filed by the appellant for a decree for Rs 1,59,54374 paise and other reliefs.

2. On November 16, 1978 the appellant as the plaintiff filed the said Suit No. 818 of 1978 against the respondents (who were the defendants in the court of the first instance) for recovery of Rs. 1,59,543.64 paise and other reliefs. It appears that after filing of the said suit the appellant made an application for appointment of a Receiver and by an interim order dated November 16, 1978 and final order dated December 5, 1978 Receiver was appointed in the above suit It is stated that Receiver, A K. Dhandhania, is now holding approximately Rs. 57,000/-

3. After filing of the suit no steps were taken by the Advocates-on-record M/s. Khaitan & Co. on behalf of the appellants (who was the plaintiff in the said suit) for taking out writ of summons and lodging the same with the Sheriff for service upon the defendants, as re




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top