SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 156

JYOTIRINDRA NATH HORE
Nawsher Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
C.F. Ali, Hafizur Rahaman for the appellant;
M.C. Chakraborty, B.B. Kolay for the State.

JUDGEMENT

This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 3.12.75 passed by the learned District Judge, Murshidabad in Title Appeal No. 281 of 1972 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 15.7.72 passed by the learned Munsif, Additional Court, Kandl in Title Suit No. 12 of 1972.

2. The admitted facts are that the suit-land originally belonged to Sisir Kumar Mukherjee, predecessor-in-interest of respondent nos. 2 to 13, who held the same as a raiyat. He had in his possession agriculture land exceeding the limit of 25 acres. He submitted a return in ‘B’ form under to a 6(5) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In 1956 and thereby opted to retain some lands including the suit land. A Khanda Khatian was accordingly prepared and the rent was assessed at Rs. 27.22 for the retained lands. Thereafter by a registered sale deed dated 14.5.57 he sold the suit-land to the plaintiff appellant for valuable consideration. By a government notification dated 21.1.58, Rule 4A was inserted in the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Rules thereby prescribing a procedure for choosing lands which an intermediary is entitled to retain under










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top