SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Cal) 161

HARISH TANDON
Sarmi Chatterjee – Appellant
Versus
Udayan Chatterjee – Respondent


ORDER

This revisional application is directed against Order No. 41 dated October 10, 2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 13th Court, Alipore in Miscellaneous Case No. 19 of 2011 by which an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, is disposed of.

2. This revisional application is at the instance of the wife assailing the aforesaid order on two fold grounds. Firstly, that the quantum of maintenance granted by the Trial Court is not in commensurate with the income of the husband more particularly in relation to the status and the comforts which the parties used to avail during the conjugal period. Secondly, that the alimony pendente lite should have been directed to be paid from the date of an application and not from the date of the order.

3. Admittedly, a salary certificate was produced for the month of June, 2012 by the husband/opposite party before the Trial Court. The parties agreed for determination of the quantum of monthly alimony pendente lite on the basis of such disclosure.

4. The Trial Court found that the net monthly income of the husband/opposite party is Rs. 61,000/- and odd. Although the husband/opposite party specifically averred in the w


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top