NIRENDRA KRISHNA MITRA, DIPAK PRAKAS KUNDU
N. Raghvan Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
The judgment of the Court was as follows :––
Mitra, J.: Heard Mr. Mukherjee, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Roy, learned Counsel for the respondents.
2. In the present case, the appellant is the writ petitioner, challenged in the writ application a notice being Annexure 'C' to the writ application, whereby, he was asked to show cause as to why the tenancy of Subhash Deep Colonisation Multipurpose Society Ltd. should not come to an end under Section 151(1) of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands Land Revenue & Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 as it was reported by the Tahasildar, Port Blair that the trustees of the said Society had not utilised the disputed land fully for the purpose for which it was given to the Society, thereby causing permanent injury to the land, besides illegal transaction made by the trustees in violation of the statute, inter alia. on the grounds of arbitrariness, illegality, vagueness, etc. the learned Trial Judge, however, had dismissed the writ application ex parte on 25th March, 1995, holding inter alia, that the same was premature and the appellant/petitioner could not come to writ Court in a short out manner by circuitous way by overlapping the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.