KALYANMOY GANGULY
Dolgobinda Kayal – Appellant
Versus
West Bengal Board of Secondary Education – Respondent
1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, inter alia, challenges the disciplinary proceeding initiated against him and the order of suspension along with a prayer for directing the authorities concerned to hold the election of the Managing Committee of the School forthwith.
2. So far as the last prayer is concerned the petitioner does not press the same and confines himself to the question of only the order of suspension and the issuance of the charge-sheet.
3. It appears from the affidavit of service filed in Court that all the respondents have been served with the copies of this application. Inspite of such service no one appears for the respondents excepting the State. There is no affidavit-in-opposition on record and the statements and allegations made in the writ petition are not denied by any of the respondents and as such are deemed to be admitted by the application of the doctrine of non-traverse.
4. The petitioner was appointed as a Special Cadre, Asstt. Teacher of Madhusudanpur Laxmipur Radhakanta Academy (High School) on or about May, 12, 1970. On May 1, 1972 the petitioner was appointed as Head Master of the said School
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.