IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Basudeva Panigrahi and Mr. Justice Malay Kumar Basu, JJ.
Bhagyabati Mondal & Ors. -Petitioners
Versus
The State of West Bengal -Opposite Party
Cr. M. No. 183 of 2001
Decided on : March 7, 2001
BAIL - SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - SECTIONS 167(2) (A)(1)(II) AND 306 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - INTERPRETATION OF 'UPTO 10 YEARS' AND 'NOT LESS THAN 10 YEARS' - APPLICABILITY OF 60 DAYS OR 90 DAYS PERIOD OF DETENTION - COURT HELD THAT IN CASES WHERE THE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT IS 'UPTO 10 YEARS', THE PERIOD OF DETENTION IS 60 DAYS, WHILE IN CASES WHERE THE SENTENCE IS 'NOT LESS THAN 10 YEARS', THE PERIOD OF DETENTION IS 90 DAYS.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a bail application filed by the petitioners who were arrested in connection with a case of dowry death under Sections 498 and 304 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The petitioners contended that they were entitled to bail since no charge-sheet could be submitted within 60 days from the date of their custody, as mandated by Section 167(2) (a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioners were entitled to bail as the investigation relating to the offence punishable with imprisonment for a term of not less than 10 years was not completed within 90 days, as prescribed under Section 167 (2) Cr. P.C.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to bail under Section 167(2) (a) of the CrPC since no charge-sheet was submitted within 60 days from the date of their custody.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the terms 'upto 10 years' and 'not less than 10 years' as used in Section 167(2) (a) of the CrPC. It held that in cases where the maximum punishment is 'upto 10 years', the period of detention is 60 days, while in cases where the sentence is 'not less than 10 years', the period of detention is 90 days.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioners' bail application and directed their release on bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/- each with two sureties, one of whom must be a local, to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (SDJM), Rampurhat.
Panigrahi, J.:
1. This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to release the applicants on bail as they were arrested in connection with Margram Police Station Case No. 98/2000 dated 13.11.2000 arising out of the G. R. Case No. 618/2000 under Sections 498 and 304 of I.P.C. wherein the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat had rejected the prayer for bail.
2. The prosecution story as it revealed from First Information Report is as follows :
That the de facto-complainant's daughter Shyamali was given in marriage to Goutam Mondal as per Hindu Rites and Customs. It is further stated in the report that while the deceased Shyamali was staying in her matrimonial house, she was subjected to excessive torture as a result of which she could no longer tolerate any torture or humiliation, set herself ablaze on 19.10.2000 by pouring kerosene upon her person. Immediately thereafter, it is alleged that the victim was sent to Udaypur Public Health Centre at the first instance but, subsequently, she was referred to Rampurhat Sub-Divisional Hospital. Subsequently, she succumbed burn injuries on 11.11.2000.
3. The petitioners few days after the registration of the case surrendered themselves in Court below on 17.11.2000 and as their prayer for bail was rejected they filed this application.
4. Mr. A. Sanyal, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners has strongly contended that the petitioners are otherwise entitled to bail since no charge-sheet could be submitted within 60 days from the date of their custody. It has been further submitted that they surrendered to judicial custody on 17.11.2000, as there has been no charge-sheet filed against the accused till today. Therefore, they are otherwise entitled to bail under Secti0n 167(2) (a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. While appreciating the case of the petitioner it is necessary to quote Section 167(2) (a)(1)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure which are quoted here below :
"The Magistrate to whom the accused person is forwarded under the time authorize the detention of the accused in such custody as it thinks fit, for a term not exceeding fifteen days in the whole, and if he has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial, and considers further detention unnecessary, he may order the accused to be forwarded to a Magistrate having provided that(a) the Magistrate may authorize the detention of the accused person, otherwise than in the custody of the police, beyond the period of fifteen days if he is satisfied, that adequate ground exist for doing so, but no Magistrate shall authorize the detention of the accused person in custody under this paragraph for a total period exceeding-
(i) ninety days, where the investigation relates to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years;
(ii) sixty days, where the investigation relates to any other offence, and, on the expiry of the said period of ninety days, or sixty days' as the case may be, the accused person shan be released on bail if he is prepared to and does furnish bail, and every person released on bail under this sub-section shall be deemed to be so released under the provisions of Chapter XXXIII for the purposes of that chapter.
5. It is highlighted that if the investigation relating to an offence punishable with "an imprisonment for a term of not less than 10 years" is not completed within 60 days, then the accused shall be entitled to statutory bail. It should be remembered that the term 'not less than 10 years' is not to be confused with the term 'upto 10 years'. In a case where the maximum punishment is up to 10 years, the period of detention that is permissible under Section 167 (2) Cr. P.C. is only 60 days. Mr. Sanyal has further contended that there are two different expressions stated in the• Code, i.e., 'upto 10 years' and not less than 10 years', where the sentence 'upto 10 years' has been prescribed, the
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.