SATYABRATA SINHA, DIBYENDU BHUSAN DUTTA
Calcutta Municipal Corpn. – Appellant
Versus
Paresh R. Kampani – Respondent
Leave in terms of prayer (a).
2. The appeal is treated as on the day's list in view of the order proposed to be passed herein.
3. The appeal is directed against an order dated 9th April, 1997 whereby and where under the learned Trial Judge allowed the writ application filed by then writ petitioner/respondent questioning the validity of an order passed by the Hearing Officer. On an objection filed by the writ petitioner as regards the valuation of premises No. 21. Chanditola Mala Road, Calcutta the Hearing Officer passed the following order :-
“Assessee is present. See inspection report. Heard the assessee. Seen also I.B. After hearing both the parties and considering the matter the reasonable rent is fixed at Rs. 1,000/- and municipal annual value therefore come to Rs. 10,800/- after allowing statutory deduction as admissible.”
4. The learned Trial Jodge, In our opinion, has rightly held that, the said order is not a reasoned order. The Hearing Officer while disposing of the objection filed by in assessee is statutorily obliged to pass a reasoned order. It is now well settled principles of law that assignment of reason is also one of the limbs of principles of natural Just
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.