SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 170

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Basudeva Panigrahi, J.
The Managing Committee, Kanaidighi Deshapran Vidyapith – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 3827 (W) of 1998
Decided on: 7th April, 1998

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Amal Baran Chatterjee and Soumen Kr. Dutta, for the petitioner
Mr. S.K. Mukherjee, for the respondents

THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS IS OBLIGED TO ACCORD PERMISSION TO THE SCHOOL AUTHORITY FOR FILLING UP VACANT POSTS WHICH AROSE PRIOR TO THE ACT COMING INTO FORCE.

Headnote:

WEST BENGAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION ACT - SECTION 2 - COURT HELD THAT THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS WAS OBLIGED TO ACCORD PERMISSION TO THE SCHOOL AUTHORITY FOR FILLING UP VACANT POSTS WHICH AROSE PRIOR TO THE ACT COMING INTO FORCE.

Fact of the Case:

THE TWO TEACHERS RETIRED ON 30.6.97 AND 31.7.97 RESPECTIVELY, LEAVING TWO VACANT POSTS. THE SCHOOL AUTHORITY SOUGHT PERMISSION FROM THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS TO FILL THE POSTS, BUT IT WAS REJECTED. THE SCHOOL AUTHORITY THEN FILED A WRIT PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT.

Finding of the Court:

THE HIGH COURT HELD THAT THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS WAS OBLIGED TO ACCORD PERMISSION TO THE SCHOOL AUTHORITY FOR FILLING UP THE VACANT POSTS WHICH AROSE PRIOR TO THE ACT COMING INTO FORCE.

Issues: WHETHER THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS COULD BE DIRECTED TO ACCORD APPROVAL FOR FILLING UP THE TWO VACANT POSTS WHICH FALL VACANT PRIOR TO COMING INTO FORCE OF THE WEST BENGAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION ACT.

Ratio Decidendi: THE COURT HELD THAT THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS COULD NOT REJECT THE PRAYER OF THE PETITIONER AS THE VACANCY AROSE PRIOR TO THE ACT COMING INTO FORCE AND THE MANAGING COMMITTEE HAD TAKEN STEPS TO SEEK PERMISSION FROM THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS.

Final Decision: THE COURT ISSUED A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS TO ACCORD APPROVAL FOR HOLDING SELECTION OF THE TWO ASSISTANT TEACHERS IN THE LANGUAGE GROUP.

Judgment

Heard Mr. Chatterjee in support of the application, and Mr. Mukherjee, the learned Advocate appearing for the State of West Bengal.

2. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to cancel/withdraw/rescind. Annexure 'G' to the writ application and also writ in the nature of Mandamus be issued to the District Inspector of Schools for filling up the two posts of Assistant Teacher in language group.

3. The essential facts emerging in the writ application are as follows:-

Two teachers, namely, Gaya Prosad Jana and Sudhangshu Sekher Mahesh who were appointed on 1.7.37 and 18.7.37 respectively as Assistant Teachers in the stream of Bengali and English under the language group who had been retired on and from 30.6.97 and 31.7.97 and therefore, consequently, two posts of Assistant Teachers in the language group had fallen vacant. The school authorities by its resolution dated 31st January, 1997 issued a letter on 14.5.97 to the District Inspector of Schools enclosing therewith all relevant papers for according permission to fill up the poses of Assistant Teachers on the eve of retirement of Gaya Prosad Jana. Similarly, by resolution dated 20th August, 1997 the school authorities made a further request for permission to fill up the post of Sudhangshu Sekhar Mahesh after his retirement. But since no permission was accorded by the District Inspector of Schools, the school authority through its Managing Committee was obliged to file a writ in this Court for appropriate direction and accordingly, the District Inspector of Schools (S.B.), Midnapore was directed to dispose of the letter dated 3rd September, 1997 by according permission to the school to fill up the posts of two Assistant Teachers.

4. The District Inspector of Schools, however, after such direction was issued from this Court, passed an order vide Annexure 'G' to the writ petition, whereby he rejected the prayer of the petitioner for permission to fill up the vacancies. Therefore, this Managing Committee, being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order, has filed the case.

5. Mr. Chatterjee, learned Advocate, appearing for the petitioner, has argued with great vehemence that the District Inspector of Schools has, in the instant case, palpably committed grave error in rejecting the petitioners' prayer inasmuch as the Managing Committee has sought permission to fill up those posts on 3rd September, 1997 much before the West Bengal School Service Commission Act had come into force. Mr. Mukherjee, learned Advocate appearing for the State of West Bengal, has seriously contended that after passing of West Bengal School Service Commission Act, the school authority became defunct and they have no manner of right to fill up the vacant posts which in accordance with the Act should be filled up by the Commission. He hah also drawn my attention to Section 2 of the said Act which revealed that the Act shall come into force from the date of publication in the Official Gazette. On seeing the Official Gazette it is found that the Act was published on 15th January, 1998.

6. The sole question arises for consideration in this case is whether the District Inspector of Schools could be directed to accord approval for filling up the two vacant posts which fall vacant prior to coming into force of the West Bengal School Service Commission Act. In the instant case, the vacancy arose on 30th June, 1997 and 31st July, 1997. The Managing Committee, times without number, submitted representation to the District Inspector of Schools for granting them permission to fill up those posts in accordance with the Rules then existing but somehow or other, those representations did not evoke any response from the District Inspector of Schools. Obviously, the school authority even communicated to the District Inspector of Schools much prior to the Act having come into force. The learned Advocate appearing for the writ petitioner



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top