BHAGABATI PROSAD BANERJEE, RONOJIT KUMAR MITRA
Binoy Kumar Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Swata Chandra – Respondent
Banerjee, J.: This case discloses some peculiar facts which are distressing and this case had a chequered career. This petitioner, Binoy Kumar Mondal, a Primary Teacher, appeared in person before the learned Single Judge and because of his ignorance of law and the practice and procedure followed by this Court, he had to pay a penalty.
2. For the purpose of appointment of a Primary Teacher an Interview took place by the competent authority and on the basis of the regular interview in accordance with the Recruitment Rules, the petitioner Binoy Kumar Mondal was placed 26 in the panel. It is not in dispute that in the said panel was giving effect to in respect of the some candidates in the panel and the petitioner has been able to find out at least one candidate of the said candidates who has been given appointment on the basis of the said selection panel, for not giving appointment on the basis of the panel as prepared. The petitioner moved the writ application before the learned Single Judge whereupon D.K. Basu, J. by an order dated 17.8.1992 Inter alia directed the District Inspector of School, Primary Education, Murshidabad to file a report as regard the claim of the petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.