SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 348

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Chandan Kumar Banerji, J.
Reverend Father Joseph D'Souza & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
West Bengal Board of Secondary Education & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Rule No. 5271 (W) of 1977
Decided on: 7th October, 1982

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Bhaskar Gupta and Samir Chakraborty, for the Petitioner
A.K. Mukherjee, for the Board of Secondary Education and the Appeal Committee
Indrajit Sen, for Respondent No. 4

The right of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice under Article 30 of the Constitution is absolute and unfettered, and the State or any statutory authority cannot interfere with the internal administration or management of a minority institution.

Headnote:

ST. XAVIER'S COLLEGIATE SCHOOL, CALCUTTA V. APPEAL COMMITTEE, WEST BENGAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION - [ARTICLE 30] - [WEST BENGAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT, 1963] - [CODE OF REGULATIONS FOR EUROPEAN (NOW ANGLO INDIAN) SCHOOLS IN BENGAL (NOW WEST BENGAL), 1921] - [SPECIAL RULES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS ESTABLISHED AND RUN BY A CHRISTIAN CHURCH/MISSIONARY SOCIETY (BOARD)/RELIGIOUS SOCIETY ETC.] - [ARTICLE 26] - [ANDHRA PRADESH ACT XVII OF 1976] - The West Bengal Board of Secondary Education and its Appeal Committee lack the authority to interfere with the internal management and administration of a school established and managed by a religious minority under Article 30 of the Constitution.

Fact of the Case:

The St. Xavier's Collegiate School, Calcutta, a school established and managed by the Society of Jesus, a religious minority, challenged the decision of the Appeal Committee of the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education (Board) holding that it had jurisdiction to hear and dispose of an appeal filed by a teacher whose services were terminated by the school.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the school was established and managed by a religious minority within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution and that the Board and its Appeal Committee had no jurisdiction to interfere with the internal management and administration of the school, including the termination of the teacher's services.

Issues: 1. Whether the school was established and managed by a religious minority within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution. 2. Whether the Board and its Appeal Committee had jurisdiction to interfere with the internal management and administration of the school.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Article 30 of the Constitution guarantees the right of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. 2. This right is absolute and unfettered, and the State or any statutory authority cannot interfere with the internal administration or management of a minority institution. 3. However, the State can take regulatory measures to promote efficiency, excellence, and educational standards and issue guidelines to ensure the security of service of teachers and other employees of the institution. 4. The Board and its Appeal Committee, by entertaining the appeal of the terminated teacher, had encroached upon the school's right to administer its affairs and violated Article 30 of the Constitution.

Final Decision: The Court quashed the order of the Appeal Committee and held that the Board and its Appeal Committee had no jurisdiction to interfere with the internal management and administration of the school.

Judgment

In this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the decision of the Appeal Committee of the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education the respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Appeal Committee) holding that it had jurisdiction to hear and dispose of the Appeal No. 75/72 preferred by Joseph D'Sa Pravu the respondent No. 4 against the authorities of the St. Xavier's Collegiate School, Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the school). The petitioners Nos.1 to 11 are members of the Managing Committee of the school who are stated to have been nominated by the Provincial Superior of the Calcutta Province of the Society of Jesus. The petitioner No. 13 is the school which is claimed to have been established by the said society of Jesus and has been and is being run, managed and administered by the Jesuits of Calcutta. It is, therefore, claimed that the school was established and has been and is being managed and administered by a religious minority community within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The school is an unaided Higher Secondary School and it sends up candidates for the Higher Secondary Examination held by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, the respondent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the Board). The respondent No. 4 was appointed as a lay teacher of the school in 1958. For certain acts of indiscipline he was suspended and thereafter he was given a chargesheet and was asked to show cause why his services in the school should not be terminated. The respondent No.4 showed cause against the said charges and after considering the same the Managing Committee of the school terminated his service. The respondent No. 4 filed a suit being Title Suit No. 527 of 1972 against the school in the City Civil Court at Calcutta, which is pending. The respondent No. 4 preferred an appeal being Appeal No. 75/72 before the Appeal Committee and prayed for ad interim stay of his suspension and dismissal. The Secretary of the Managing Committee of the school duly appeared and placed all relevant papers before the Appeal Committee and opposed the prayer for ad interim stay. The Appeal Committee decided that there was no case for ad interim stay. The school submitted its objections to the said appeal inter alia challenging the jurisdiction of the Board to exercise and control over the school and that of the Appeal Committee to entertain or hear the appeal. By a letter dated 24th January, 1973 the respondent No. 4 forwarded to the school a copy of a letter dated 20th January, 1973 issued by the Secretary of the Board a copy whereof was also subsequently received by the school from the Secretary of the Board. From the said letter dated 20th January, 1973 it was found that on the 19th December, 1972 the Appeal Committee had directed reinstatement of the respondent No.4 and it was stated that the school was absent on the date of hearing of the appeal in spite of notice of such hearing although no such notice was received by the school. The petitioners moved a writ petition in this Court challenging the said decision of the Appeal Committee wherein a rule nisi was issued. The respondent No. 4 appeared and contested the said Rule. By an ordered dated 18th February, 1975 this Court set aside the said order of the Appeal Committee solely on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice in passing the said order while the rights and contentions of the parties in the said appeal including the question jurisdiction of the Appeal Committee were left open by the said order. At a meeting of the Appeal Committee held on the 28th January, 1976 the Rector and President of the school appeared and submitted a letter of even date before the Appeal Committee, inter alia, contending that the school was an institution founded, established and managed by Christians and was protected by Article 30 of the Constitution of India and nothing contained in the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 196




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top