SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 151

NIRMAL CHANDRA MUKHERJI, AMITABHA DUTTA
Kamala Ranjan Dey – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner: Sobhendu Sekhar Roy

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was as follows :––

Dutta, J. : This revisional application is for quashing the proceeding, being C. S. G. R. Case No. 1074 of 78 under section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, pending in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, including the charge framed against the petitioner by an order dated 18.8.1980.

2. The prosecution case was that on 4.11.78 Sri N. L. Sharma, Sub-Inspector of Police attached to the District Enforcement Branch, visited the fertilizer-shop of the petitioner and found on physical verification that the actual stock of fertilizers was short of or less than the book balance. As a result, he seized the stock of fertilizers and the books of accounts and filed a case which was registered at Mayureswar Police Station. Thereafter he investigated the case and submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner.

3. The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offence on the said charge-sheet and ultimately after considering the materials filed along with the charge-sheet, framed the charge under section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 against the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by the l





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top