SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 128

GANENDRA NARAYAN RAY
Dol Gobinda Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner: Mahitosh Majumdar and Asoke Kumar Ganguli.
For Respondents: D. N. Das and S. N. Banerjee.

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was as follows :––

In this Rule, a charge-sheet dated 30th October, 1975, being Annexure 'A' to the writ petition, an Investigation Report dated 3rd January 1978, being Annexure 'N' to the writ petition and the second Show-cause Notice issued to the petitioner on 8th March, 1978, being Annexure 'P' to the writ petition, are under challenge.

2. It appears that the petitioner joined the Engineering side of the Telegraphic Department in December 1952 as Telegraphic Supervisor and, thereafter, the petitioner was transferred from Bhubaneswar and joined Calcutta Telephones some time in March, 1976 and had been working there as Sub-divisional Officer in 43/44 Exchange. The petitioner was served with a charge-sheet dated the 30th October, 1975 in connection with an enquiry under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. The charge-sheet and imputation of charges accompanying the charge-sheet were issued by one Sri Dubey who was the Deputy Inspector General (Vigilance). The petitioner asked for various documents mentioned in the petitioner's letter. But all such documents were not made available to the petitioner a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top