IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Murari Mohan Dutt and Ram Krishna Sharma, JJ.
Bengal Coal Co. Ltd. – Plaintiff/Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Defendant/Respondent
Appeal from original Order no. 765 of 1974
Decided On : July 5, 1979
RAILWAYS ACT - SUIT FOR COMPENSATION - JURISDICTION - SECTION 80 OF THE RAILWAYS ACT DOES NOT EITHER EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION REPEAL OR OVERRIDE THE PROVISION OF SECTION 20 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiffs filed a suit for compensation for short delivery of goods against the defendant, Union of India representing the South Eastern Railway. The defendant raised a preliminary objection to the territorial jurisdiction of the court, arguing that the suit should have been instituted in a court having jurisdiction over the place where the goods were delivered for carriage or in the court having jurisdiction over the place where the destination station is situate, as per Section 80 of the Railways Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that Section 80 of the Railways Act does not either expressly or by necessary implication repeal or override the provision of Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that the suit was rightly instituted in the court below, as per the provision of Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, since the defendant carries on the business of the railway at its headquarters within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.
Issues: Whether Section 80 of the Railways Act overrides the provision of Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 80 of the Railways Act does not either expressly or by necessary implication repeal or override the provision of Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that the two provisions can exist simultaneously and that the suit was rightly instituted in the court below, as per the provision of Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the lower court, directing it to dispose of the case in accordance with law.
Dutta, J.
The plaintiffs, who are the appellants before us, feel aggrieved by order No. 13 dated December 19, 1978 of the Subordinate Judge, Sixth Court, Alipore whereby he came to the finding that he had on territorial jurisdiction to try the suit and, accordingly directed the return of the plaint for presentation to the proper court.
2. The plaintiffs instituted the said suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 28863/- on account of compensation for short delivery of goods. The case of the plaintiffs was that the a consignment of 423 pcs. of M.S. Black Plain Sheets was booked at Burnpur by the Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited for carriage by the railway to Chinakuri. The plaintiff No. 1 was the owner and the endorsed consignee for valuable consideration in respect of the consignment. At the destination station the consignment was delivered with a shortage of 413 pcs. of the above Sheets and, accordingly, the plaintiff No. 1 suffered a loss to the extent of Rs. 28863/- and odd due to total negligence on the part of the railway administration. The consignment was covered by the policy of insurance issued by the plaintiff No. 2. The plaintiff No. 1 preferred the claim on the plaintiff No. 2 and the latter had paid the claim to the respondent No. 1 in consequence whereof and on the basis of the letter of subrogation, the plaintiff No. 2 became entitled to recover compensation from the defendant for the loss caused as aforesaid.
3. In paragraph 14 of the plaint, it has been alleged that the cause-of-action for the suit arose at the delivery station but since the head office of the South Eastern Railway is at Garden Reach, Calcutta, within the jurisdiction of the court of the Subordinate Judge, the suit was filed in that court.
4. The defendant, Union of India representing the South Eastern Railway raised in its written Statement a preliminary objection to the territorial jurisdiction of the court of the Subordinate Judge to try the suit and, accordingly, the learned Subordinate Judge framed an issue being issue No. 1 relating to the question of territorial jurisdiction. The learned Subordinate Judge came to the finding that in view of Sec. 80 of Indian Railways Act, he had no territorial jurisdiction to try the suit. In that view of the matter, he passed the impugned order directing return of the plaint for presentation to the proper court. Hence this appeal.
5. The only question that is involved in this appeal is whether the court below has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and hear the suit. Sec. 80 of the Indian Railway Act, as amended, provides as follows :-
"80 Suits for Compensation. A suit for compensation for loss of life of, or personal injury to, a passenger or for loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery of animals or goods may be instituted: (a) if the passenger was or the animals or goods were booked from one, station to another on the railway of the same railway administration, against that railway administration, (b) if the passenger was, or the animals or goods were booked through over the railway of two or more railway administrations, against the railway administrations, from which the passenger obtained his pass or purchased his ticket or to which the animals or goods were delivered for carriage, as the case may be or against the railway administration on whose railway the destination station lies or the loss, injury, destruction, damage or deterioration occurred; and, in either case, the suit may be instituted in a court having jurisdiction over the place his ticket or the animals or goods were delivered for carriage, as the case may be, or over the place in which the destination station lies, or the loss, injury, destruction, damage or deterioration occurred".
6. Under Sec. 80 a suit for compensation can be instituted inter alia in a court having jurisdiction over the place at which the goods were delivered for carriage or in the court having jurisdiction over the place in which the des
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.