SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 29

MURARI MOHON DUTT
Ram Barai Shaw – Appellant
Versus
Bibhabati Basak – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manindra Nath Ghose
Pranab Kumar Ghose

JUDGMENT

This appeal is at the instance of the defendant and it arises out of a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession.

2. The case of the plaintiffs is that the suit land as per schedule 'A' to the plaint was allotted to the share of Sm. Jagat Pabani Dasi by the final decree for partition passed in Title Suit No. 51 of 1928 of the 6th Court of Subordinate Judge, Alipore. In terms of the decree, the Receivers of her estate were required to pay some owelty money to the other parties in that suit. In order to recover his share of the owelty money, Shib Chandra Bose, one of the parties to the suit, put the decree into execution and one Brindaban Chandra Basak purchased the 'A' schedule land and the other adjacent lands in auction as benamdar of the present plaintiffs. A sale certificate was issued in the name of Brindaban who took delivery of possession of the suit land through court on November 15, 1953. Thereafter, the plaintiffs began to use and occupy the suit land in khas as a garden. Brindaban executed a deed of release in favour of the plaintiffs on December 23, 1955 disclaiming his interest in the suit land. During Revisional, Settlement Operation, the defendan



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top