PARESH NATH MOOKERJEE, A.K.DUTTA
Prafulla Kumar Datta – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Chandra Bose – Respondent
Mookerjee, J.
We very much regret that we ever asked for or made this Reference. The object, which we had in view at the time, has been entirely frustrated, as the Reference has not been answered by the Full Bench and the matter has been remitted back to us under an apparent mistake or misconception or misapprehension as to the Rule of this Court, under which this Reference was made or sent by us. We sought for quick assistance to resolve a deepening judicial crisis which was fast developing. That assistance has been deferred, if not altogether denied.
2. In our order of Reference, no doubt, there was an obvious typographical error in that Rule 2 was mentioned, in place of Rule 3, of Chapter VII of the Appellate Side Rules. But the said order of Reference was sufficiently clear on the point, as it distinctly mentioned that it was a Reference in an appeal from original decree, which, patently, attracted Rule 3 and had connection with Rule 2, which dealt with References in other cases. Even without such mention, it could not have been overlooked that it was a Reference in a pending First Appeal, which came directly under Rule 3 and to which Rule 2 had no application.
3. We were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.