SANJIB BANERJEE
Prasanta Kumar Pahari – Appellant
Versus
Goutam Ghosh – Respondent
The petitioner seeks the reference of the disputes between the parties to arbitration on the strength of the arbitration clause contained in the agreement of sale executed by the parties on March 14, 2007.
2. It is not in dispute that the agreement for sale has ultimately culminated in a deed of conveyance being executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondent on December 8, 2008.
3. The respondent perceives that the construction undertaken by the petitioner was of poor quality and the petitioner is liable to compensate the respondent therefor. The respondent has instituted proceedings before the Consumer Forum to such effect. The petitioner has not applied under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Consumer Forum, but has invoked the arbitration clause contained in the agreement for sale by issuing a letter to the respondent wherein the petitioner's choice as the petitioner's nominee on the arbitral Tribunal has been indicated. The present request under Section 11 of the 1996 Act has been carried to the Chief Justice or his designate upon the respondent failing to respond to the notice or refusing to complete the constitution of the arbi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.