High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
NISHITA MHATRE & SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE, JJ.
Lalu @ Lalmohan Mahato & Another
Versus
The State of West Bengal
C.R.A. No. 115 of 2006 (Appellate Side)
Decided On: 15-09-2014
CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER - CONVICTION - EVIDENCE - WITNESSES - MEDICAL EVIDENCE - CORROBORATION - SECTION 302, 323, 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) - EYE WITNESSES' TESTIMONY CORROBORATED BY MEDICAL EVIDENCE - MOTIVE ESTABLISHED - APPELLANTS' GUILT PROVEN - CONVICTION UPHELD.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted by the trial court for the murder of Mukti Sattar Ansari. The prosecution case was that the deceased was assaulted by the appellants with a lathi and an axe on 11th January, 2001 at about 6 A.M. The deceased sustained grievous injuries in his brain and face and died on the spot. The prosecution relied on the evidence of eye witnesses, medical evidence, and the appellants' confession.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the evidence of the eye witnesses, P.W.1 and P.W.2, was corroborated by the medical evidence and the appellants' confession. The court also found that the appellants had a motive to kill the deceased as the deceased was involved in erecting a boundary wall behind a Shiv Mandir, which the appellants objected to.
Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution has been able to prove the guilt of the appellants beyond reasonable doubt. 2. Whether the evidence of the eye witnesses is reliable and can be relied upon.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution had been able to prove the guilt of the appellants beyond reasonable doubt. The court relied on the evidence of the eye witnesses, which was corroborated by the medical evidence and the appellants' confession. The court also found that the appellants had a motive to kill the deceased.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellants.
Samapti Chatterjee, J.
(1) The instant appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order of conviction passed in Sessions Trial being No. 29 of 2005 and Sessions Case No.179 of 2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Purulia on 18th January, 2006 and 19th January, 2006 holding the accused persons/appellants guilty of offence punishable under Sections 302/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- each in default of which shall suffer simple imprisonment for four months for the charge under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.1000/- in default of which shall suffer simple imprisonment for four months for the charge under Section 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
(2) Put in a short frame, the prosecution case runs as under:
(3) On 11th January, 2001 at about 9:05 A.M. Jakir Ansary of Pokhuria village lodged a verbal complaint regarding the incident at Purulia Muffosil Police Station which was written by S.I. Narayan Chandra Mahato who accordingly registered Purulia Muffosil P.S. Case No.6 dated 11.01.2001 under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the two accused persons.
Prosecution version in brief as stated in the F.I.R is that on 10.01.2001 there was quarrel and assault between the parties over the issue of raising a wall behind the Shiv Mandir. In order to evade arrest by the Police deceased Mukti Sattar Ansary, his son Samim Ansary as well as complainant Jakir Ansary left their house at Pokhuria village for Purulia on 11.01.2001 at about 4:45 A.M.. On the way in between Kolbandh and Jaleswar at about 6 A.M. they were intercepted by accused Lalu and Bikash Mahato who were armed with ‘dang’ (lathi) and ‘Kural’ (axe) respectively. The first named accused assaulted Jakir Ansary with ‘lathi’ on his legs while accused Bikash Mahato dealt ‘kural’ blow on the head of deceased who fell down in consequence thereof whereupon he was subjected to successive blows with ‘lathi’ and ‘kural’ by both the accused persons which resulted in his death. Complainant Jakir Ansary and Samim Ansary fled towards Jalewswar and reported the incident to Masuruddin Ansary of Jaleswar as well as to Sariful Kadri the Imam of Purulia Bara Masjid.
On the basis of the F.I.R. lodged by the complainant Jakir Ansary S.I. Narayan Chandra Mahato started the case which was entrusted for investigation to S.I. Radhakanta Pati. Investigation into the case was finally concluded by S.I. Probodh Chandra Patra who laid the charge-sheet under Sections 302/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the two accused persons.
Thereafter charges under Sections 302/323/34 were framed against the accused persons and they pleaded not guilty for the offences. Accordingly trial started and after completion of trial the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-I Purulia held the appellants guilty and convicted him as aforesaid.
(4) In order to prove its’ case the prosecution has examined as many as eighteen witnesses (19) in this regard.
(5) The P.W.1` nephew of the deceased stated in his evidence that on 11th January, 2001 he and his uncle Sattar Ansari and Sattar’s son Samim Raja left their house at about 4:45 /5 A.M. for Purulia via Kolbandh through the Relif Road. After crossing Kolbandh when they approached a field at that time accused Bikash Mahato and Lalu Mahato came from the eastern side with an ‘axe’ and ‘dang of kancha kath’. They obstructed them and Lalu started assaulting the P.W.1 with dang on his right leg and thereafter on his left leg also. Bikash inflicted a blow on his uncle (deceased) with axe. Thereafter Bikash and Lalu struck the deceased with axe and dang respectively. The deceased fell down then and started shouting “Save Me, Save Me”. When the deceased fell down the accused persons struck him at random with ‘axe’ and ‘dang’. Thereafter when deceased stop shouting then the P.W.1 and P.W.2 realised th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.