SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Cal) 239

NISHITA MHATRE, R.K.BAG
Debrabata Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Arup Guha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

NISHITA MHATRE, J.

1. Being aggrieved by the decision of the Trial Court dated 12th December, 2014 in Title Suit No. 2015 of 2009, the appellant has approached this Court. By the impugned order the Trial Court has held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit and therefore, passed an order under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') rejecting the plaint. The Court was of the view that the plaint could not be entertained as it was barred by the provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'WBPT Act, 1997').

2. A brief chronology of facts is required to be mentioned in order to comprehend the relationship between the parties. The appellant filed proceedings under Section 26(3) of the WBPT Act, 1997 in which he prayed for a declaration that he was a direct tenant of M/s. Chamaria Properties Private Limited, i.e. the Respondent No. 4 herein. The application was dismissed on 19th June, 2012 by the Controller on the ground that the Controller was barred from passing any order in view of the fact that litigations between the parties were pending in the civil courts.

3. Proceedings under Section 41 of the Pr



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top