1. On 27th January, 2015, when the petitioners prayed for leave under Rule 21 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959, the learned senior counsel representing the company objected to such leave being granted by this Court. After hearing the parties and upon considering the law on the issue, this Court delivered a judgment, the operative portion whereof is quoted herein-below:-

"As such, the deponents are directed to satisfy this Court that they were duly authorised by the petitioning creditors to make and file the affidavit verifying the instant winding-up petition, by producing valid resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the petitioning-creditors supported by powers of attorney given in their favour by the petitioning-creditors. Let such documents be produced before this Court on 29th January, 2015."

2. Consequently, the matter is again taken up for consideration for such purpose, as stated above.

3. The learned senior counsel representing the petitioners produces a document which purports to be a power of attorney issued by UBS AG dated 5th November, 2014, signed by two persons, namely, Celine Teo and Pram Kurniawan, described as Executive Directors. The power of attorn