SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Cal) 256

NISHITA MHATRE, ASHA ARORA
Bindeswari Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Uttama Debi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: Mr. Hiranmay Bhattacharya
For the Respondent: Mr. Sankar Nath Dhar

JUDGMENT

Nishita Mhatre, J.


1. Gobordhan Dubey died on 29th November, 1989 leaving behind his wife, four sons, and the wife and children of his pre-deceased son. Gobordhan Dubey allegedly executed a Will on 6th November, 1980 and his sons Bindeswari, Lakhu and Prabhu Dubey were the executors of the Will. Prabhu Dubey, however, died prior to his father. After the death of Gobordhan Dubey, Bindeswari Dubey filed an application for probate of his father’s Will being Probate Case No.13 of 1991. The application was contested by the other heirs of Gobordhan Dubey and was converted to O.S. No.1 of 1995. Bindeswari contended in his plaint that his brother, Lakhu was in possession of the original registered Will of Gobordhan Dubey. He pleaded that despite repeated requests, Lakhu had refused to produce the original Will and therefore the plaintiff had submitted that application on his own for probate on the basis of a certified copy of the Will of Gobordhan Dubey.


2. The defendants, i.e., the other heirs of Gobordhan Dubey, by two separate written statements denied the existence of a Will executed by Gobordhan Dubey. They contended that it was because a civil suit had been instituted by them a





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top