SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE
Jyotsna Bala Maity – Appellant
Versus
Hansibala Pramanik – Respondent
Samapti Chatterjee, J.
1. Challenging order no.125 dated 21st Februray, 2015 passed by Sri Suthirtha Banerjee, Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) 2nd Additional Court, Contai, in Title Suit No.5 of 2007 whereby the Learned Judge allowed application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of written statement, the plaintiff/petitioner filed the instant revitional application.
2. Mr. Debasish Ray, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner contended that the Learned Judge erred in law by allowing the said application for amendment of written statement whereby the defendants/opposite parties sought to delete/withdraw the admissions by way of amendment application which is not permissible in law.
3. Mr. Ray further vehemently urged that admission cannot be withdrawn or omitted by filing application under order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code.
4. Mr. Ray further contended that after lapse of more than 17 years of filing of the written statement the defendant nos. 6 to 7 on 20.12.2014 filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the written statement and in the said proposed amendment virtually
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.