SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Cal) 482

BISWANATH SOMADDER
Sanatan Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
Paschim Banga Gramin Bank – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Subrata Roy Karmakar, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1:- C.R. Baksi, Advocate.

ORDER :

Biswanath Somadder, J.

1. Let the affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be taken on record.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order dated 21st January, 2015, passed by the appellate authority of Paschim Banga Gramin Bank. By the said order, the appellate authority concurred with the findings of the disciplinary authority dated 29th July, 2011. Penalties imposed by the disciplinary authority were on the basis of two charges, both of which were proved and the petitioner was dismissed from service and further was disqualified from future employment in the bank.

3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the appellate authority failed to take into consideration the fact that on the same issue for which he was charged, a criminal proceeding was initiated by the Bank, which culminated in his "honourable acquittal" by the learned Judge of the Special Court, 1st Court, Hooghly, in terms of the judgment rendered on 30th June, 2014, in Special Case No. 4 of 2012. In this context, the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner refers and relies on a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in the case of S. Bhaskar Reddy & Anr. v. Superinten











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top