TAPAN KUMAR DUTT, MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI
Bipasha Bhowal – Appellant
Versus
Biplab Bhowal – Respondent
Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated March 15, 2012 in Matrimonial Suit No. 78 of 2009 and 79 of 2009 passed by learned Additional District Judge, 4th Court at Alipore, District 24 Parganas (S).
2. The husband filed a Matrimonial Suit No. 78 of 2009 praying for a decree of divorce and the wife filed a Matrimonial Suit No. 79 of 2009 praying for restitution of conjugal rights. Learned trial court disposed of the Suits analogously and decreed the Mat Suit No. 78 of 2009 under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act filed by the husband Biplab Bhowal against his wife Bipasha Bhowal on contest without cost and dismissed the Matrimonial Suit No. 79 of 2009 filed by the wife Bipasha Bhowal against her husband Biplab Bhowal under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act on contest without cost.
3. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree, the wife has preferred these appeals as appellant.
4. The husband, in Mat Suit No. 78 of 2009, is plaintiff and the wife in the said Suit is defendant. On the other hand, the wife, in Mat Suit No. 79 of 2009, is plaintiff and the husband in the said suit is defendant. In order to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.