SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEBANGSU BASAK
Kartick Chandra Kamila – Appellant
Versus
Prafulla Kumar Mali – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.B. Sahoo and Mr. Sudhakar Biswas, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Debangsu Basak, J.

1. A suit for declaration and permanent injunction was decreed by the Trial Court. On appeal, the decree was reversed. The suit was dismissed with cost. Hence the present second appeal. The plaintiff in Title Suit No. 286 of 1985 divided the immovable properties involved in the suit into three Schedules namely Schedule A, B and C. So far as Schedule A property was concerned, the plaintiff claimed that, he purchased the same from the recorded owner and, therefore, came into possession thereof. In respect of the Schedule B property, the plaintiff stated that it belonged to Draupadi Bewa who by a deed of gift dated September 23, 1921 transferred it to Gunadhar Mali. Gunadhar Mali died leaving behind only one heir and legal representative, his wife, Gayamoni. Gayamoni sold Schedule B property to the father of the plaintiff by a registered deed dated January 24, 1937. The father of the plaintiff, therefore, came into possession of the Schedule B property. So far as Schedule C property was concerned, Sashibhusan Das sold the same by a registered deed of conveyance in 1922 to the father of the plaintiff. The father of the plaintiff came into possession of the S










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top