SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Debasish Kar Gupta, J.
Anadi Prasad Mahato – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
W.P. No. 14668 (W) of 2012
Decided On : 23-07-2013

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Swapan Banerjee and Sougata Mitra, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Hasanuz Zaman, Advocate.

Terminal benefits should not be withheld based on extraneous considerations unrelated to the individual's service, especially when no disciplinary action was taken during the tenure.

Headnote:

Terminal Benefits - Service - Criminal Proceedings - Withholding of Terminal Benefits

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a former headmaster, filed a writ application seeking the release of his terminal benefits. A criminal proceeding unrelated to his service had been initiated against him, leading to the withholding of his terminal benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the criminal proceeding had no connection to the petitioner's service, and no disciplinary action was taken against him during his tenure. The withholding of terminal benefits was deemed to be based on extraneous considerations.

Issues: The main issue was the withholding of the petitioner's terminal benefits due to a criminal proceeding unrelated to his service.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that terminal benefits should not be withheld based on extraneous considerations unrelated to the individual's service, especially when no disciplinary action was taken during the tenure.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to release the petitioner's terminal benefits with interest, and disposed of the writ application with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT :

Debasish Kar Gupta, J.

1. This writ application is filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent No. 2 to release his terminal benefits arising out of his service as a Headmaster of Palashkala Gopalpur Junior High School, P.O. Banbahal, District-Purulia. Having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties as also after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find that during the tenure of the above service a criminal proceeding was initiated against the petitioner under sections 148/149/302 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Trial No. 109 of 1989. He was convicted in the above case. Subsequently, he preferred an appeal being CRA 225 of 2005 in the matter of Anadi Mahato v. State of West Bengal & Ors. The above matter is pending and he has been enlarged on bail by an order dated November 16, 2009.

2. The learned State Advocate submits on instruction that due to the pendency of the appeal the terminal benefits of the petitioner arising out his service under reference have not been released.

3. After perusing the materials on record I find that the criminal proceeding under reference had no nexus with the service of the petitioner. No allegation of pecuniary loss of the respondents arising out of the service of the petitioner is involved in any proceeding. No disciplinary proceeding was initiated against the petitioner during his service tenure. Therefore, the terminal benefits have been withheld by the respondent authority on extraneous consideration.

4. In view of the above, I direct the respondent No. 2 to release the terminal benefits to the petitioner arising out of his service as the Headmaster of the school under reference within a period of two months from date together with interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum on arrears for the period from the date on which it was issued and payable till the date of its actual payment.

5. The rate of interest is fixed at 9 per cent taking into consideration the highest prevailing rate of interest payable on a fixed deposit by a nationalised bank and the same shall be paid from the public exchequer at the first instance, The Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, School Education Department is directed to release the aforesaid interest from the salary of the concerned District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, District-Purulia within three months or by way of raising public demand in case of his retirement from the service for depositing in the public exchequer.

6. The writ application is, thus, disposed of.

7. There will be, however, no order as to costs.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top