SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANJIB BANERJEE
Sasan Power Limited – Appellant
Versus
G. S. Atwal & Co. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Anubhav Sinha and S.K. Samantha, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjib Banerjee, J.

The petitioner herein is justifiably aggrieved by the manner in which the trial court has approached a matter pertaining to an unconditional bank guarantee and the unnecessary adjournments granted by the trial court in allowing the plaintiff to enjoy an undeserving order.

2. An unconditional bank guarantee was furnished in favour of the petitioner herein for a sum in excess of Rs. 2.21 crore. The following two clauses of the bank guarantee are sufficient to understand the scope thereof and the obligation of the bank to pay upon a first written demand being made thereunder by the beneficiary:

"4. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration inter alia of the Owner granting the Suppliers the Contract, the Bank hereby unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees and undertakes, on a written demand, to immediately pay to the Owner any amount so demanded (by way of one or more claims) not exceeding in the aggregate Rs. 2,21,25,000.00 ( Rs. Two Crore Twenty-one lac Twenty-five thousand Only) without any demur, reservation, contest or protest and/or without reference to the Supplier and without the Owner needing to provide or show to the Bank grounds or reasons or give any jus













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top