ASHOKE KUMAR DASADHIKARI
Debasish Batabyal – Appellant
Versus
Chaitali Batabyal – Respondent
Ashoke Kumar Dasadhikari, J.
1. The order impugned passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Barrackpore, North 24-Parganas on 8th December, 2014 in Title Appeal No.29 of 2012 refusing the prayer of the petitioner to add him as party in the Title Appeal is under challenge in this revisional application.
2. Mr. Roychowdhury, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the property in question was owned by Sri Sri Gopinath Jew alias Shri Shri Radha Krishna Jugalmurty. Smt. Krishna Rani Bhuiya as shebait representing deity instituted a suit against the opposite party nos.1 to 4 being the defendants in the suit with a prayer for a decree of ejectment and recovery of khas possession of the suit property. During pendency of the suit Krishna Rani Bhuiya executed a lease deed in favour of one Debkumar Khan.
3. Mr. Roychowdhury submits that it would appear from the registered sale deed that Krishna Rani Bhunia is the shebait of the deity and fully in charge of management and administration of the said property, which was not in a position to maintain and repair it. The property was lying in most dilapidated condition for want of necessary repair
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.