SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY
Mukesh Purswani – Appellant
Versus
Karnani Properties Ltd. – Respondent
Siddhartha Chattopadhyay, J.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the learned Judge 5th Bench in-charge Presidency Small Causes Court passed vide Order No. 60 dated 10.02.2016 in connection with Misc. Case No. 46 of 2016 (which arose from Ejectment Execution Case No. 89 of 2010) the present petitioner has filed this application for setting aside the impugned order and prayed for giving him a chance to contest in miscellaneous case under Order 21 Rule 97/101 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. which is filed for a declaration that he is the tenant in respect of the suit premises and also for permanent injunction.
2. According to the petitioner, the learned Court below did not consider his application mainly on the ground that in connection with a direction of a Co-ordinate Bench of this High Court in C.O. 4453 of 2015 he has fixed the date of delivery of possession on 11.03.2016. Learned Court below further held that there was sufficient scope to recover the possession after delivery of possession and on the basis of his above finding he has rejected his application, wherein he wanted to get a declaration that he is the tenant in respect of the suit premis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.