JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA, ISHAN CHANDRA DAS
Ratna Bose @ Basu – Appellant
Versus
Jharna Mullick – Respondent
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.
1. Leave is granted to the learned advocate-on-record of the appellant to rectify the defect in the appeal in terms of the report of the Stamp Reporter.
2. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13th June, 2016 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court at Alipore in Ejectment Appeal No. 26 of 2012 reversing the judgment and decree dated 30th June, 2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court at Alipore in Ejectment Suit No. 285 of 2008 at the instance of the defendant/appellant.
3. Let us now consider the merit of the appeal to find out as to whether any substantial question of law is involved in this appeal for which the appeal is required to be admitted for hearing under the provision of Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure or not.
4. The eviction suit was filed by the husband of the respondent no.1 herein since deceased against the defendant/appellant. It was alleged by the plaintiff that Jogesh Chandra Bose, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants was the original tenant in the suit property. The husband of the respondent no. 1 was the transferee landlord. The pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.