Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.

Re : CAN No. 11820 of 2016

1. This Miscellaneous Appeal was filed beyond the period of limitation. There was 96 days’ delay in filing the appeal.

2. Reason for the delay has been explained by the appellants in their application for condonation of delay.

3. It is stated therein that 13 petitioners are all partners of the partnership firm who are running the brick field business in the name and style as Ashli Bricks. Since no individual of the said partnership business could take the ultimate decision for filing this appeal for challenging the order passed by the writ court, some delay was caused.

4. Ultimately such decision for preferring an appeal was taken by the appellants/petitioners at a point of time when the time for preferring the appeal expired. However, immediately after such decision was taken by the appellants/petitioners, they applied for the certified copy of the impugned order dated 13th July, 2016 on 28th September, 2016. Requisites for obtaining the certified copy of the said order was put in on 4th November, 2016; i.e. the day when requisites to be put in by the appellants, was notified. The certified copy of the impugned order was m