SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Cal) 831

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Siddhartha Chattopadhyay, J.
Sanjay Halder & Others – Petitioners
Versus
Budhan Rajak – Opposite Party
C.O. No. 2979 of 2015
Decided On : 30-03-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Ms. Sayantanee Chatterjee, Mr. Sandeep Bose and Mr. Sarbananda Sanyal.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhattacharya and Ms. Shohini Chakraborty.

Pre-emption is available in respect of bastu land under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.

Headnote:

PRE-EMPTION - BASTU LAND - WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS ACT, 1955, SECTION 8 - Whether pre-emption is available to a purchaser of a well-demarcated portion from an admitted owner who subsequently sold the remaining portion to a third party on the ground of co-sharership. Whether bastu land is pre-emptible or not.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed an application for pre-emption under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, claiming that they were entitled to pre-empt a portion of a bastu land sold by the original owner to a third party. The Trial Court dismissed their application, holding that pre-emption was not available in respect of bastu land. The First Appellate Court reversed the Trial Court's decision, holding that bastu land was also covered under the definition of land in the Act and that pre-emption was therefore maintainable.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the First Appellate Court was correct in holding that bastu land was also covered under the definition of land in the Act and that pre-emption was therefore maintainable. The Court further held that the petitioners, as purchasers of a well-demarcated portion of the land from the original owner, did not become co-sharers with the original owner and were therefore not entitled to pre-emption on that ground.

Issues: 1. Whether pre-emption is available to a purchaser of a well-demarcated portion from an admitted owner who subsequently sold the remaining portion to a third party on the ground of co-sharership. 2. Whether bastu land is pre-emptible or not.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. A purchaser of a well-demarcated portion of land from the original owner does not become a co-sharer with the original owner. 2. Bastu land is covered under the definition of land in the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, and is therefore pre-emptible.

Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the revisional application filed by the petitioners.

JUDGMENT :

Siddhartha Chattopadhyay, J.

1. This revisional application is directed against the Order dated 18.06.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 1st Court at Jangipur, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 8 of 2014, affirming the Order dated 03.10.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) 1st Court, Jangipur in Miscellaneous Case No. 12 of 2008.

2. According to the petitioner, learned Trial Court below failed to appreciate that in respect of land which is bastu in nature pre-emption application under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act is maintainable and that the learned First Appellate Court failed to appreciate that the petitioners are being the adjacent land owners can maintain the application for pre-emption specifically when a portion of the land is transferred to a stranger in respect of the suit property.

3. Before dealing with the points agitated before this Court factual aspects of this case is to be re-looked. According to the parties, it is undisputed that the suit land was originally belonged to one Padmakamini Devi who had 30 decimal of land in plot of land bearing No. 870 and the said plot is under the jurisdiction of Jangipur Municipality. It is also admitted by the parties that Padmakamini Devi by virtue of a registered deed of sale bearing No. 1432 dated 18.03.1957 sold the said property to one Kalipada Das and his name was recorded in the R.S.R.O.R. That Kalipada Das sold the property to one Dilip Kumar Singha by virtue of a registered deed of sale bearing No. 1540 dated 20.02.1964. There is no controversy over the issue that Dilip Kumar Singha had possessed the said property and he sold 5.75 decimals of land to the petitioners of a Miscellaneous Case No. 12 of 2008 under a well-demarcated portion. Thereafter, he sold the said property to the present opposite party (Budhan Rajak) and it was registered on 31.01.2008. According to the present petitioner, he is a co-sharer in respect of the said suit land and he is entitled to get pre-emption being one of the co-sharers of the suit property. He also contended that although it is a bastu land yet he is entitled to get pre-emption. As against this, the opposite party contended that since a well-demarcated portion of a holding is sold in that case the subsequent purchaser cannot become a co-sharer in respect of the said property. He also contended that the bastu land is not pre-emptible.

4. After hearing submission of the parties it seem to me that the following legal points emanates from the respective submissions:-

(1) Whether the pre-emption is available to a purchaser of well-demarcated portion from an admitted owner who subsequently sold the remaining portion to a 3rd party on the ground of co-sharership.

(2) If the bastu land is pre-emptible or not.

5. Now, I have to answer to the point No. 1. In the interest of effective adjudication I would like to refer Section 8 of West Bengal Land Reforms Act “Section 8. Right of purchase by co-sharer or contiguous tenant.-

(1) If a portion or share of a plot of land of a raiyat is transferred to any person other than a co-sharer of a raiyat in the plot of land, the bargadar in the plot of land may, within three months of the date of such transfer, or any co-sharer of a raiyat in the plot of land may, within three months of the service of the notice given under Sub-Section (5) of Section 5, or any raiyat possessing land adjoining such plot of land may, within four months of the date of such transfer, apply to the Munsif having territorial jurisdiction, for transfer of the said portion or share of the plot of land to him, subject to the limit mentioned in Section 14 M, on deposit of the consideration money together sum of ten per cent of that amount:

Provided that if the bargadar in the plot of land, a co-sharer of raiyat in a plot of land and a raiyat possessing land adjoining such plot of land apply for such transfer, the bargadar shall have the prior right to have such portion or share of t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top